Talk:Best TV Shows Wiki

Jump to navigation Jump to search

About this board

Not editable

Basically a Saloon Bar of this wiki where you can say anything thing you want, place for general chit-chat about virtually anything that is either off-topic or related to this wiki. If any related to this wiki, you can ask us for help and we'll do that for you!


🍷DRINKS!🍸

Can Mega Man: Fully Charged be added to this wiki?

8
HalJordan008 (talkcontribs)

If its added, we should protect it from the rabid haters.

Matthew The Guy (talkcontribs)

To me, it's the most unfaithful video game cartoon ever made.

HalJordan008 (talkcontribs)

What if I tell to you that it isn't based on a video game from the Megaman franchise and its a completely new story.

Matthew The Guy (talkcontribs)

Then make your own character. Don't take one from a video game with an established universe.

WageTheGoblin12 (talkcontribs)

Then again, the Sonic movie was kinda like the Megaman cartoon, except that was a good movie.

Trevor807 (talkcontribs)

Because it's faithful to the games. Fully Charged doesn't even go for that.

NintenDylan64 (talkcontribs)

I think Mega Man: Upon A Star should get a page, even though it's an OVA.

I want to leave this wiki.

8
HalJordan008 (talkcontribs)

Since the admins of the wiki are becoming more strict with the pages, this wiki started to be boring for me, but I try to improve certain pages adding more information, and since my phone's screen got broken I can't and images to the articles. I will continue being more active on Great Characters Wiki and Loathsome Characters wiki.

PerryPikaplush (talkcontribs)

I still agree with you

EijiZeBoi (talkcontribs)

That's an extremely petty reason to leave, Jordan. Why do you care if pages get deleted because of their shitty quality?

Trevor807 (talkcontribs)

Apparently he thinks pages of well-received shows can be rewritten. They can, but adding a rewrite tag would encourage phoning it in.

Kesner (talkcontribs)

If a page has rewrite tag then it is basically saying "Meh. It's unfinished. Will finish it later."

WageTheGoblin12 (talkcontribs)

SHUT UP, SHUT UP, OH MY GOD

-Not Smirks

What happened to the Chip and Potato page?

2
KitsMiz (talkcontribs)

Because it honestly deserves to be here.

WageTheGoblin12 (talkcontribs)

The page was terrible and had completely generic reasoning. God, do some research on this wiki on how to make a good page.

Is there a rewritte tag?

15
HalJordan008 (talkcontribs)

If there isn't any rewritte tag, create it.

TheChisatoFan (talkcontribs)

No. Rewrite tags act similarly to Stub templates, which are useless since according to Masson Thief, they don't work on wikis like this type. And Reception Wikis are not informative wikis. Whenever people make articles, they should always work on their drafts on their sandboxes first before importing it on the main pages. Otherwise, incomplete pages get deleted.

HalJordan008 (talkcontribs)

Remember, ONLY delete pages that do NOT deserve to be here, some articles of shows that were well received were deleted because no one improved them, and stub templates aren't useless, they can motivate people to improve a page.

Seanbuscus2600 (talkcontribs)

Even when a template is on an article nobody tries to improve said article. Not to mention it's fucking pointless since we can easily see how poorly made those articles are. We don't need a template to remind us of that.

WageTheGoblin12 (talkcontribs)

That's an awful claim, Jordon. We don't delete pages because they're "well-received" we delete pages because they're badly written. Have you read some of the articles? If not, read this and this.

TheChisatoFan (talkcontribs)

Exactly. We don't need new templates. We only need more quality control towards the articles we write. Which is why the well-written articles stay here while the low-effort ones on the other hand usually get deleted; regardless of how well-received a show gets.

Inkster (talkcontribs)

Um, no.

Trevor807 (talkcontribs)

Look, adding one would be like saying “You don’t need to put any effort on this page”. Soon pages with that will flood the whole wiki.

WageTheGoblin12 (talkcontribs)

I'm starting to wonder if the horrible pages are being made by underaged users.

Seewater514 (talkcontribs)

That's exactly what happened when we had the stub templates, some users would make very half-assed pages and then slap the template on top.

Kesner (talkcontribs)

Yeah we don't really need a rewrite tag. I got bored of seeing those on ATYW.

HalJordan008 (talkcontribs)

Thats why I want to leave BTSW and (probably) TTSW, admins can't improve certain pages which is something bad.

Trevor807 (talkcontribs)

They can be improved, but only in the sandbox. Adding a template like this encourages users to half-ass pages. Even if they can be improved, said users never do that. This is one of the pettiest reasons why anyone would leave.

HalJordan008 (talkcontribs)

Sadly,I can't add images via my PS4.

Trevor807 (talkcontribs)

Plus, with the template, quality control will soon be rare.

Someone add the 1966 Batman TV series to this wiki.

4
Summary by HalJordan008

It was already done.

HalJordan008 (talkcontribs)

Since its a cult TV Show it must be here.

Trevor807 (talkcontribs)

You can make it yourself. Unless you haven't seen it.

HalJordan008 (talkcontribs)

I only saw clips of the show.

NintenDylan64 (talkcontribs)

There should also be a page on The Dukes of Hazzard and Knight Rider.

You know what, i understand.

4
Shrekpacito13 (talkcontribs)

I should stop complaining about everything like an sjw and act like im not, ill stay away from discussions and just edit for now on

Shrekpacito13 (talkcontribs)

And i am not a sjw or a troll. I just very biased opinons and i believe all people are equals, as what the lord said

Trevor807 (talkcontribs)

It's simply a common theme in Japan.

Portrock1566 (talkcontribs)

That's a type of expression. After all, it's fictional so it's unfair to censor it just because. We're designed with sexual characteristics for a reason (no it's NOT to reproduce). However people should love and not lust as long if they don't act on it.

We should add Watchmen (The 2019 live action series) to this wiki.

12
HalJordan008 (talkcontribs)

That show was very well received by the viewers so it deserves an article.

WageTheGoblin12 (talkcontribs)

Are you sure about that? It has a low audience score on RT.

HalJordan008 (talkcontribs)

I never watched it, and I believed that it was a huge success.

LA2002 (talkcontribs)

Also, a lot of those haters as I know are just Obnoxious Anti-SJWs trying to sh*tpost all over what they perceive as pandering towards the left even in the slightest.

Also, remember Wage, the Audience Score isn't always any better than the critic score, either.

HalJordan008 (talkcontribs)

Online scores can be easily review-bombed.

LA2002 (talkcontribs)

That's what I was talkin' about.

HalJordan008 (talkcontribs)

One of my relatives said to me that a lot of people talk about that show, and ever a person who was working on a comic-book store which I visited on my last vacation a few days ago said to me that Watchmen is trending now when i was chosing a comic book and I found the Before Watchmen series on the store but I bought a collected trade paperback edition of Marvels on that day.

HalJordan008 (talkcontribs)

My vacations were the reason why i wasn't active on Miraheze during a few days, and my phone's screen got broken.

Trevor807 (talkcontribs)

There's a reason why Solo is on AMW, and that movie has a high RT audience score.

HalJordan008 (talkcontribs)

Same with Mutafukaz

WageTheGoblin12 (talkcontribs)

Except Mutafukaz was actual garbage.

Trevor807 (talkcontribs)

Maybe it can be added.

I'm thinking of starting my own youtube channel in the future...

3
Stomps (talkcontribs)

I'm thinking of starting my own Cartoon Reviewing youtube channel (that hopefully doesn't end up like Vailskibum94 or worse). The channel is gonna be like a combination of The Alpha Jay Show and Chris Stuckmann, an Animated Character reviewing a Cartoon or a Youtuber that gives scores at the end of the review (Example, Amphibia C- 54/100). i'll call the channel "Stomp-it Don!" (I will not use Doggy Don in the series, Sorry Pakdam Pakdai fans..). If a cartoon gets a score lower than a C-, then it's bad, If higher than a C+, Then it's good, in between is Average

1-10 = F-

11-17 = F

18-29 = F+

30-34 = D-

35-39 = D

40-49 = D+

50-54 = C-

55-60 = C

61-65 = C+

66-70 = B-

74-78 = B

79-83 = B+

84-89 = A-

90-97 = A

98-100 = A+


Anyone have suggestions to improve my channel idea?

Trevor807 (talkcontribs)

I wish you luck with this. Great concept.

NintenDylan64 (talkcontribs)

Same with me. I might do my own game reviews, mostly gonna start with NES games. And I might make some plush videos as well.

Should Super WHY! be added on this wiki?

22
Spidey McFly (talkcontribs)

I would make a sandbox page, but I haven't seen the show for years.

KitsMiz (talkcontribs)

Every PBS show should be on this wiki. In fact, here's a blogpost mentioning shows that should be here (I added several, including Super WHY!).

Masson Thief (talkcontribs)

Uh, I don't know more than half the shows of that list.

Matthew The Guy (talkcontribs)

I have no objection against Super WHY! being here.

Masson Thief (talkcontribs)

You are greenlighted.

Spidey McFly (talkcontribs)

Actually, I changed my mind, like a girl changes clothes. I recently watched the series on Netflix, and realised it’s not as good as I remembered, even for preschool show standards. I think I’ll make an unpublished sandbox page, like with Caillou.

Matthew The Guy (talkcontribs)

Pretty sure you watched the reboot. Even if you didn't, it's probably not as good as you remember because it's a preschool show you probably only watched as a kid.

Masson Thief (talkcontribs)

Super WHY! has a reboot too? Didn't know that. They really are making reboots for everything.

Spidey McFly (talkcontribs)

There is no reboot, Masson.

Masson Thief (talkcontribs)

Matthew claims otherwise though.

Spidey McFly (talkcontribs)

Well he's mistaken. There is no reboot for Super WHY!

Matthew The Guy (talkcontribs)

I remember seeing an article on the TTVSW for a Super WHY! reboot. Of course it was deleted because it was niche audience, but it made some points about how different it was to the original.

Spidey McFly (talkcontribs)

Interesting.

Masson Thief (talkcontribs)

Interesting indeed, was it on FANDOM or here on Miraheze?

Masson Thief (talkcontribs)

Also, even if you don't want to make the page anymore the show is still greenlighted for other users interested in making an article.

Stephenfisher2001 (talkcontribs)

I'm making this page anyway on my sandbox, Theif.

Matthew The Guy (talkcontribs)

It was indeed here on Miraheze.

Stephenfisher2001 (talkcontribs)

Really? So, it was deleted due to generic reasons? That sucks.

Matthew The Guy (talkcontribs)

No, because it was niche audience of course.

Stephenfisher2001 (talkcontribs)

I was talking about if it was on Best TV Shows, Matthew.

Matthew The Guy (talkcontribs)

I don't think it ever was on this wiki, just the opposite one.

Stephenfisher2001 (talkcontribs)

I see, I'll see what I can do to put it on BTSW. :)

Seanbuscus2600 (talkcontribs)

Whoever keeps adding the "this show feels like a ripoff of (insert show here)" pointer on various articles, stop already. Inspiration does not mean ripping off other shows. That's like if I said that DC is a ripoff of Marvel. Does that make any sense to you? I thought so.


If you can't be creative with your edits, don't edit at all.

HalJordan008 (talkcontribs)

It makes sense in some cases, for example Robotboy lacks of originality in some elements.

Seanbuscus2600 (talkcontribs)

You just admitted to adding that pisspoor pointer to many articles. Just because you think it's a "ripoff" doesn't mean it should be considered a bad quality. One opinion doesn't change the quality of a show, video game, etc. I'm no admin here but I'm sick of these nitpicking edits and articles.

Matthew The Guy (talkcontribs)

Agreed.

Trevor807 (talkcontribs)

Same here.